Mielograma na rotina laboratorial para a clínica de cães
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The myelogram corresponds to the bone marrow evaluation and it represents an important resource in the dog’s clinics to determinate alterations in the blood circulation. Its basis is the assessment of bone marrow, which in adults is mainly present in flat bones such as the sternum and ribs, and its main function is hematopoiesis, the production of blood cells, which are red blood cells, leukocytes (granulocytes - neutrophils, eosinophils and basophils, agranulocytes - monocytes and lymphocytes) and platelets. The myelogram requires the correct collection of the bone marrow, and its analysis involves the assessment of cellularity, determination of the Myeloid:Erythroid ratio, assessment of iron reserves and research for parasites, the most common in canine species being Leishmania spp. and Ehrlichia spp. The search for alterations in the bone marrow is usually done when the patient has hematological abnormalities that are not explained by other routine tests. Its analysis and interpretation help the veterinarian to reach the correct diagnosis for the patient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".