Anomalous Ionization Regime in a Forced Electron Beam Induced Arc Discharge Ion Source for Singly Charged Radioactive Ion Beam Production
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract At TRIUMF’s ISAC facility, 1+ Radioactive Ion Beams (RIBs) of noble gases, halogens, and molecules are created using a Forced Electron Beam Induced Arc Discharge (FEBIAD) ion source. Reported ionization efficiencies for FEBIADs range from 10% to 25% for 40 Ar + , while TRIUMF-FEBIAD ionization efficiency seems to be < 1% with a 90% emittance <15 μm. As RIB ion sources aim for a high ionization efficiency, an experimental and numerical campaign was conducted to investigate the comparably low efficiencies observed. The experimental results for 40 Ar + indicate that up to a 10% ionization efficiency is possible by operating the source at different parameters. The measurements agree with theoretical estimations; however, certain combinations of parameters produce an anomalously high electron current which enhances the ionization efficiency threefold. Present investigations aim to characterize and model the anomalous electron current because, if proven reliable, the argon ionization efficiency could reach 30% with no significant impact on beam emittance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".