The solid variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a multi‐institutional retrospective study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: The definition of papillary thyroid carcinoma, solid variant (PTC-SV) varies from >50% to 100% of solid/trabecular/insular growth (STI). We aimed to identify prognostic factors and to establish an appropriate STI cutoff for PTC-SV in this multi-institutional study of 156 PTCs with STI. RESULTS: Nodal metastases were seen in 18% and were associated with a higher percentage of papillary and STI. When substratified by infiltration/encapsulation status, the STI percentage did not impact the risk of nodal metastasis. pN1 stage was seen in 51% of infiltrative tumours and 1% of encapsulated lesions. Overall, PTC with STI had an excellent prognosis. The 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 87% in the entire cohort, 94% in encapsulated lesions, and 76% in infiltrative tumours. The STI percentage did not impact DFS. Fifty-four patients had noninvasive encapsulated lesions with 2-100% STI. None developed recurrence. Encapsulated lesions were enriched with RAS mutations (54%), whereas infiltrative lesions lacked RAS mutations (4%). The BRAF V600E mutation was an infrequent event, being seen in 11% of the entire cohort. CONCLUSION: In PTC with STI, the determining factor for nodal metastasis and DFS is the encapsulation/infiltration status rather than the STI percentage. Encapsulated noninvasive tumours with STI follow an indolent course with a very low risk of nodal metastasis and recurrence. Overall, PTC with STI has an excellent prognosis, with a 10-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and DFS of 96% and 87%, respectively. Therefore, the classification of SV-PTC as an aggressive PTC subtype may be reconsidered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".