MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224936470 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.170217

Estimation of Intensity Duration Frequency for Ungauged Basin in Lampung Province, Indonesia

2022· article· en· W4224936470 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMultimedia Learning Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRain gaugeIntensity (physics)Environmental scienceStructural basinDrainage basinClimatologyMeteorologyHydrology (agriculture)GeographyCartographyGeologyPrecipitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Frequency duration intensity (IDF) analysis was conducted to estimate the peak flow rate based on the minimum rainfall data collection station. Rainfall data used is data with high intensity that occurs in a short time from automatic rainfall recording stations. Currently, the availability and distribution of automatic rain recording stations in Lampung Province, Indonesia, are still limited. Therefore, this study aims to use the IDF approach in the ungauged basin area for areas with rainfall data that do not meet the hydrological analysis criteria by interpolating rainfall data from 126 manual rainfall measuring stations in Lampung Province, Indonesia. The research method includes analysis of rainfall intensity using the Mononobe equation at various durations and returns periods. Next, create a rainfall intensity map (isohyet) using ArcGis. Finally, compare the IDF analysis of daily rainfall data at 4 automatic rainfall gauge stations with the estimation results based on the intensity map (isohyet). Based on the results of data analysis, it is known that from the available 126 rainfall climatology stations, there are 113 rainfall climatology stations with complete data for 10 years and 13 rainfall climatology stations with incomplete data for 10 years. In addition, the study results show that 45.24% of the daily rainfall in Lampung province is in the low category, 53.97% is in the medium category, and 0.79% is in the high category. This study indicates that rainfall intensity data from climatological rainfall stations that do not meet the hydrological criteria can be found by interpolating rainfall intensity maps from the nearest rain climatology station that meet the hydrological analysis criteria. The relationship test of the actual rainfall intensity variable at 4 automatic rainfall gauge stations with the rainfall intensity from the map (isohyet) using MAPE showed satisfactory results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.632
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it