Performance Evaluation of Nonacosan-10-ol-Based Polyethylene Packaging Material Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Packaging material has a significant role in maintaining or altering the shelf life of different products. Polymer materials are extensively used as packaging materials for different perishable and non-perishable products both during transportation and storage. This article aims at developing a new polymer composite which can be used as packaging material. This new composite addresses the challenge of controlling oxygen diffusion rates during the storage of perishable goods such as vegetables, meat and produce, etc. The proposed new composite primarily consists of nonacosan-10-ol and polyethylene. Molecular dynamics simulations (MDS) are performed by mixing 5.2%, 17.1%, 29.2%, 40.8% and 45.2% (wt/wt) of nonacosan-10-ol to amorphous polyethylene. Mechanical properties such as Young's modulus/glass transition temperature, and gas transport properties such as diffusion coefficient and diffusion volume are estimated from the MDS and diffusion related simulations consisting of different oxygen concentrations in polyethylene-alone system and polyethylene- nonacosan-10-ol blends. The impact of adding different weight percent of nonacosan-10-ol to polyethylene is quantitatively assessed and optimal composition of the proposed additive is suggested corresponding to minimal oxygen diffusion rate, high elastic modulus and good thermal stability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".