MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225105043 · doi:10.1093/brain/awac160

Mosaic divergent repeat interruptions in XDP influence repeat stability and disease onset

2022· article· en· W4225105043 on OpenAlexaff
Theresa Lüth, Susen Schaake, Björn‐Hergen Laabs, Kathleen Schlüter, Joshua Laβ, Jelena Pozojevic, Ronnie Tse, Inke R. König, Roland Dominic G. Jamora, Raymond L. Rosales, Norbert Brüggemann, Gerard Saranza, Cid Czarina E. Diesta, Frank J. Kaiser, Christel Depienne, Christopher E. Pearson, Ana Westenberger, Christine Klein

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversität zu LübeckDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsBiologyGeneticsAlu elementRetrotransposonTrinucleotide repeat expansionGenomeGeneAlleleHuman genome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While many genetic causes of movement disorders have been identified, modifiers of disease expression are largely unknown. X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism (XDP) is a neurodegenerative disease caused by a SINE-VNTR-Alu(AGAGGG)n retrotransposon insertion in TAF1, with a polymorphic (AGAGGG)n repeat. Repeat length and variants in MSH3 and PMS2 explain ∼65% of the variance in age at onset (AAO) in XDP. However, additional genetic modifiers are conceivably at play in XDP, such as repeat interruptions. Long-read nanopore sequencing of PCR amplicons from XDP patients (n = 202) was performed to assess potential repeat interruption and instability. Repeat-primed PCR and Cas9-mediated targeted enrichment confirmed the presence of identified divergent repeat motifs. In addition to the canonical pure SINE-VNTR-Alu-5'-(AGAGGG)n, we observed a mosaic of divergent repeat motifs that polarized at the beginning of the tract, where the divergent repeat interruptions varied in motif length by having one, two, or three nucleotides fewer than the hexameric motif, distinct from interruptions in other disease-associated repeats, which match the lengths of the canonical motifs. All divergent configurations occurred mosaically and in two investigated brain regions (basal ganglia, cerebellum) and in blood-derived DNA from the same patient. The most common divergent interruption was AGG [5'-SINE-VNTR-Alu(AGAGGG)2AGG(AGAGGG)n], similar to the pure tract, followed by AGGG [5'-SINE-VNTR-Alu(AGAGGG)2AGGG(AGAGGG)n], at median frequencies of 0.425 (IQR: 0.42-0.43) and 0.128 (IQR: 0.12-0.13), respectively. The mosaic AGG motif was not associated with repeat number (estimate = -3.8342, P = 0.869). The mosaic pure tract frequency was associated with repeat number (estimate = 45.32, P = 0.0441) but not AAO (estimate = -41.486, P = 0.378). Importantly, the mosaic frequency of the AGGG negatively correlated with repeat number after adjusting for age at sampling (estimate = -161.09, P = 3.44 × 10-5). When including the XDP-relevant MSH3/PMS2 modifier single nucleotide polymorphisms into the model, the mosaic AGGG frequency was associated with AAO (estimate = 155.1063, P = 0.047); however, the association dissipated after including the repeat number (estimate = -92.46430, P = 0.079). We reveal novel mosaic divergent repeat interruptions affecting both motif length and sequence (DRILS) of the canonical motif polarized within the SINE-VNTR-Alu(AGAGGG)n repeat. Our study illustrates: (i) the importance of somatic mosaic genotypes; (ii) the biological plausibility of multiple modifiers (both germline and somatic) that can have additive effects on repeat instability; and (iii) that these variations may remain undetected without assessment of single molecules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score0.655

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrainSame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207