Mosaic divergent repeat interruptions in XDP influence repeat stability and disease onset
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While many genetic causes of movement disorders have been identified, modifiers of disease expression are largely unknown. X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism (XDP) is a neurodegenerative disease caused by a SINE-VNTR-Alu(AGAGGG)n retrotransposon insertion in TAF1, with a polymorphic (AGAGGG)n repeat. Repeat length and variants in MSH3 and PMS2 explain ∼65% of the variance in age at onset (AAO) in XDP. However, additional genetic modifiers are conceivably at play in XDP, such as repeat interruptions. Long-read nanopore sequencing of PCR amplicons from XDP patients (n = 202) was performed to assess potential repeat interruption and instability. Repeat-primed PCR and Cas9-mediated targeted enrichment confirmed the presence of identified divergent repeat motifs. In addition to the canonical pure SINE-VNTR-Alu-5'-(AGAGGG)n, we observed a mosaic of divergent repeat motifs that polarized at the beginning of the tract, where the divergent repeat interruptions varied in motif length by having one, two, or three nucleotides fewer than the hexameric motif, distinct from interruptions in other disease-associated repeats, which match the lengths of the canonical motifs. All divergent configurations occurred mosaically and in two investigated brain regions (basal ganglia, cerebellum) and in blood-derived DNA from the same patient. The most common divergent interruption was AGG [5'-SINE-VNTR-Alu(AGAGGG)2AGG(AGAGGG)n], similar to the pure tract, followed by AGGG [5'-SINE-VNTR-Alu(AGAGGG)2AGGG(AGAGGG)n], at median frequencies of 0.425 (IQR: 0.42-0.43) and 0.128 (IQR: 0.12-0.13), respectively. The mosaic AGG motif was not associated with repeat number (estimate = -3.8342, P = 0.869). The mosaic pure tract frequency was associated with repeat number (estimate = 45.32, P = 0.0441) but not AAO (estimate = -41.486, P = 0.378). Importantly, the mosaic frequency of the AGGG negatively correlated with repeat number after adjusting for age at sampling (estimate = -161.09, P = 3.44 × 10-5). When including the XDP-relevant MSH3/PMS2 modifier single nucleotide polymorphisms into the model, the mosaic AGGG frequency was associated with AAO (estimate = 155.1063, P = 0.047); however, the association dissipated after including the repeat number (estimate = -92.46430, P = 0.079). We reveal novel mosaic divergent repeat interruptions affecting both motif length and sequence (DRILS) of the canonical motif polarized within the SINE-VNTR-Alu(AGAGGG)n repeat. Our study illustrates: (i) the importance of somatic mosaic genotypes; (ii) the biological plausibility of multiple modifiers (both germline and somatic) that can have additive effects on repeat instability; and (iii) that these variations may remain undetected without assessment of single molecules.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".