Delayed intracranial hemorrhage of patients with mild traumatic brain injury under antithrombotics on routine repeat CT scan: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients on antithrombotics experiencing mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) may benefit from a routine repeat CT scan to detect delayed intracranial hemorrhage (dICH). OBJECTIVES: The primary outcome was the incidence of dICH on routine repeat CT scans of mTBI patients on antithrombotics within an intra-hospital observation period of up to 48 hours. The secondary outcomes were potential risk factors, readmissions, neurosurgical interventions, and mortality. METHODS: A systematic review and a meta-analysis of single proportions were performed according to the PRISMA and PRESS guidelines. The risk of bias was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Eighteen studies with 4613 patients were included. The pooled incidence of dICH was 2% [95% CI 1-2%] with similar rates between different antithrombotic regimens, even in combination. Of the 67 patients with dICH reported (1.45%), eleven required surgery (0.24%), while six died (0.13%). Loss of consciousness was a risk factor of dICH (risk ratio 3.04 [95%CI 0.96; 9.58]). A total of 48 patients were reported for readmission without associated death or surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: The contribution of this routine repeat CT scan should be questioned due to the low incidence, the limited clinical significance, and the unsubstantiated clinical benefit of early or systematic detection of dICH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.015 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".