Himachal Pradesh's Gaddi Tribe: A Socio-Cultural Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reason for making this record is to understand the society and the strict traditions of the Gaddi tribe in Himachal Pradesh. About 17 towns from two locally improved neighborhoods in the Chamba region of Himachal Pradesh were consulted. These towns are Bhalai, Bhattiyat, Bharmaur, Chamba, Chaurah, Dalhousie, Holi, Pangi, Saluni, Sihunta, Tikri, Chamrauli, Bassa, Kuarsi, Chaned, Chhtarari, and Bhanauta of Chamba block. The envisaged Gaddi tribe may be a semi-immigrant tribe located in Himachal Pradesh and the high Himalayas of Himachal Pradesh. These tribes mainly live in the regions around the Dhauladhar, Chamba, Bharmaur, and Dharamshala mountains. Their main occupation is herding sheep and goats and preparing khadhi costumes for them. They turned the wool into charkha, then used the wool to make blankets. Gaddis need an impermanent accommodation called Hadwari. They communicate a language named Gaddi. They do this throughout the season, but mostly in winter. The female individual turns the charkha, then the male individual uses his wooden instrument called Khhade to form a blanket. In order to promote the development of this tribe, they acquired a destined tribe in 1990-91. In the constantly changing cultural pattern of life, the Gaddi people cannot avoid a substantial change in their traditional way of life due to their contact with the outside world outside of society. It records different strict societies and traditions, and finally gives some ideas to avoid wasting the strict societies and traditions of these ancestors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".