“Esketamine” in Borderline Personality Disorder: A Look Beyond Suicidality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is an extremely disabling condition that affects almost every dimension of a patient's life. The S-enantiomer of ketamine (esketamine) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2019 in conjunction with an oral antidepressant for the management of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in adults. Our patient is a 27-year-old female with a long-standing diagnosis of BPD and treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) who presented to a tertiary care hospital after a baleful suicide attempt. As per treatment guidelines, "esketamine" intranasal spray in conjunction with citalopram 20 mg was started in the outpatient setting at a dose of 56 mg twice weekly for four weeks, followed by 56 mg once weekly, which was further titrated to 84 mg once weekly. Two years into treatment, the patient and her mother report around 70% improvement in her depression and anxiety with around 80% improvement in her behavioral symptoms. Esketamine's potential action on patients with BPD can be partially explained by its very well-documented effect on the glutamate receptor antagonism. Additionally, patients with stress-induced suicidal ideations (SI), which are seen in borderline patients, are better responsive to ketamine. In conclusion, we recommend a trial of intranasal esketamine in patients with BPD with treatment-resistant MDD and frequent episodes of self-harm. Treatment with esketamine could potentially reduce the number of emergency room visits for impulsive suicide attempts and help reduce the life burden of BPD and its impact on family members.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".