Influence of staple line number and configuration on the leakage of small intestinal functional end‐to‐end stapled anastomosis: An ex vivo study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of the staple line configuration on the leakage of small intestinal functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis (FEESA). STUDY DESIGN: Experimental, ex vivo, randomized study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Jejunal segments (N = 72) from 10 mature, canine cadavers. METHODS: Jejunal segments (10 cm) were randomly assigned to a control group (8 segments) and 4 FEESA groups (16 segments/group (8 constructs/group)), according to the number of rows of staples used in the vertical (V) and transverse lines (T), respectively: Control, 2-row V/2-row T (2V/2T), 2-row V/3-row T (2V/3T), 3-row V/2-row T (3V/2T), 3-row V/3-row T (3V/3T). Initial leak pressure (ILP), maximum intraluminal pressure (MIP), and initial leakage location (ILL) were compared. RESULTS: The ILP (mean ± SD) for control segments, 2V/2T, 2V/3T, 3V/2T and 3V/3T were 321.38 ± 34.59, 32.88 ± 7.36, 50.13 ± 10.46, 34.38 ± 11.78, 69.88 ± 21.23 mmHg, respectively. All FEESAs initially leaked at lower pressures than intact segments. The only other differences detected between groups consisted of ILPs that were higher when FEESAs were closed with 3V/3T (69.88 ± 21.23 mmHg) than 2V/2T (32.88 ± 7.36, P < .001). Initial leakage occurred predominantly from the transverse staple line rather than the anastomotic crotch (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Placing 3 rows of staples in the transverse line (with or without a third row in the vertical staple line) improved resistance to leakage of FEESAs in normal cadaveric specimens. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The addition of a third row of staples in the transverse line (with or without a third row in the vertical staple line) in FEESAs should be further investigated as a strategy to reduce intestinal leakage clinically.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".