MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225272855 · doi:10.1190/geo2021-0443.1

A time-domain multisource Bayesian/Markov chain Monte Carlo formulation of time-lapse seismic waveform inversion

2022· article· en· W4225272855 on OpenAlexafffund
Xin Fu

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMarkov chain Monte CarloInversion (geology)AlgorithmComputer scienceBayesian probabilityMetropolis–Hastings algorithmInverse problemMonte Carlo methodMarkov chainMathematical optimizationMathematicsStatisticsMachine learningArtificial intelligenceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Seismic waveform inversion has been shown to be well-suited for identification and characterization of time-lapse changes in a reservoir. However, the subtle medium variations associated with enhanced oil recovery and/or CO2 storage problems give uncertainty quantification within such inverse approaches a heightened importance. To analyze both of these features of the time-lapse inverse problem, we formulate a Bayesian full-waveform inversion (FWI) procedure, based on a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm. The formulation uses several existing strategies, such as the use of a double-difference time-lapse FWI (DDFWI), incorporation of time-domain multisource data, and application of a local-updating target-oriented inversion. However, it incorporates these within a stochastic framework, involving computation of model covariance with an adaptive Metropolis algorithm, and a method to estimate data error statistics based on the features of time-lapse difference data that is incorporated. A random walk Metropolis-Hastings MCMC is adopted for optimization. In conventional, i.e., deterministic, DDFWI, inversions are carried out for the baseline and monitoring models; in the MCMC approach, a deterministic FWI procedure is carried out for the baseline model, and the MCMC algorithm is applied in the monitoring inversion stage; and the final time-lapse model is the difference between these. A feasibility study is carried out using synthetic 2D acoustic models and data, including time-lapse model estimation and uncertainty quantification. We compare the MCMC approach with conventional deterministic optimization DDFWI and remark on benefits derived, which appear to justify the expanded complexity and cost of a global approach. In addition to the availability of posterior distributions, which are critical for the assessment of the estimations, we observe that the MCMC approach tends to produce monitoring images with clearer edges and fewer coherent errors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207