MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Vitamin C Protects Against Doxorubicin‐Induced Muscle Oxidative Stress

2022· article· en· W4225311188 on OpenAlexaff
Antonio Viana do Nascimento Filho, Filipe Fernandes Stoyell‐Conti, Gauri Akolkar, Victor Hugo Martins de Miranda, Pawan Singal, Maria Cláudia Irigoyen, Kátia De Angelis, Danielle da Silva Dias

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaSt. Boniface Hospital
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsOxidative stressDoxorubicinVitaminChemistryOxidative phosphorylationVitamin CPharmacologyMedicineInternal medicineBiochemistryChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Doxorubicin, has been used as a chemotherapeutic agent, however, it is also associated with significant cardiotoxicity related to an increased oxidative stress (OS). Recent studies have shown that doxorubicin also induces skeletal muscle atrophy in preclinical models. Vitamin C (VC), which presents antioxidant properties, has been used as a pharmacological approach against cardiac toxicity. Nonetheless, the effects of vitamin C on doxorubicin‐induced skeletal muscle atrophy are still unknown. Objective Evaluate the effects of VC on OS parameters in skeletal muscle of rats exposed to doxorubicin. Methods Male Wistar rats divided into 4 groups (C: Control. VC: Vitamin C. D: Doxorubicin and VCD: VC+Dox, n=8‐10/group). Dox was administered in six doses of 2.5 mg/kg, for 3 weeks to obtain a cumulative dose of 15 mg/kg. VC was administered daily (50 mg/kg) orally for six weeks, starting one week before treatment with Dox. The gastrocnemius was weighed and homogenized for OS analysis: antioxidant profile (catalase [CAT], superoxide dismutase [SOD], glutathione peroxidase [GPx] and non‐enzymatic antioxidant capacity [FRAP]), pro‐oxidant (NADPH oxidase, hydrogen peroxide [H 2 O 2 ], nitrites) and cell damage (protein and lipid oxidation [LPO]). Results Dox reduced the gastrocnemius weight, on the other hand VC prevented it (C: 1.74±0.03; VC: 1.55±0.18; D: 0.99±0.06 and VCD: 1.23±0.06 g). There were no differences in CAT, FRAP, NADPH and nitrites between studied groups. D group showed increased concentration of H 2 O 2 compared to C and VC groups; which was not observed in the VCD group (C: 5.33±0.39; VC: 4.30±1.47; D: 8.72±1.58 and VCD: 3.66±0.73 μM H 2 O 2 ). SOD was higher in the VCD group compared to the others (C: 8.29±0.61; VC: 8.38±0.48; D: 9.94±0.61 and VCD: 10.38±0.28 USOD/mg protein). GPx was higher in VC and VCD compared to C group and lower in D compared to C and VCD group (C:0.007±0.002; VC: 0.012±0.002; D: 0.009±0.001 and VCD: 0.011±0.001 nmol/mg protein). Protein oxidation was lower in C group compared to the others (C: 3.63± 0.93; VC: 6.98±0.74; D: 5.69±0.49 and VCD: 5.98±0.29 nmol/mg protein). However, LPO was higher in D group compared to C and VC groups, and lower in VCD group compared to D group (C: 342±122; VC:364±153; D: 998±131 and VCD: 389±50 cps/mg protein). Conclusion Vitamin C protects against doxorubicin‐induced skeletal muscle atrophy and oxidative stress, suggesting a potential approach to management cardio functional disorder in patients under doxorubicin treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicChemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation→French-language works237,207→