Use of an Endoloop Ligature and a 2-Portal Coelioscopic Approach for the Removal of an Arrowhead Foreign Body in a Red-Tailed Hawk (Buteo jamaicensis)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
) was presented to the Ontario Veterinary College from a wildlife rehabilitation facility for the assessment of an arrowhead foreign body injury. The hawk was found on the ground with the left wing in a dropped position. Radiographic images revealed an arrowhead foreign body superimposed over the left lung and thoracic air sacs, immediately medial to the ribs on the ventrodorsal view, and ventral to the scapulae on the right latero-lateral view. A coelioscopy was performed using a left lateral approach with a 2.7-mm rigid endoscope into the left caudal thoracic air sac, with an additional instrument port through the left abdominal air sac. The arrowhead was visualized adjacent to the left lung, separated from the cranial thoracic air sac cavity by a membrane of fibrous tissue. The tissue membrane was radiosurgically incised. Forceps were then used to guide an Endoloop around the arrowhead. The arrowhead was secured by tightening the Endoloop, and the body wall incision was extended to facilitate the arrowhead extraction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".