MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Colonic Goblet Cells Produce Augmented Levels of Pro‐inflammatory Cytokines due to Metabolically Stressful MUC2 Mucin Biosynthesis

2022· article· en· W4225313464 on OpenAlexafffund
Ariel J. Kim, France Moreau, Hayley Gorman, Kris Chadee

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAmoebic Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMucinMucusGoblet cellMucin 2Innate immune systemCell biologyBiologyChemokineProinflammatory cytokineImmunologyMicrobiologyInflammationImmune systemEpitheliumGene expressionBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An intact mucus layer is vital in innate host defense in the gastrointestinal tract to protect the underlying mucosal epithelium from potential pathogens and toxins from the external environment whilst supporting the commensal microbiota. In the colon, goblet cells produce this essential mucus bilayer by secreting MUC2 mucin under a highly ER stressful mechanism. In conditions such as inflammatory bowel diseases and infectious colitis, goblet cells hypersecrete mucins resulting in depletion that disrupts the protective mucus layers. Goblet cells also produce pro‐inflammatory cytokines that interact with and activate other arms of the innate immune system in host defence. In this study we hypothesize that ER stress induced by MUC2 biosynthesis and production augment pro‐inflammatory responses in goblet cells. The aims of the study are: 1) to determine the pro‐inflammatory responses in WT and CRISPR/Cas9 MUC2 KO LS174T human goblet cells and 2) to determine the MAPK signalling pathways by which the pro‐inflammatory responses are altered in WT and MUC2 KO goblet cells. mRNA and protein expression of pro‐inflammatory chemokines/cytokines were analyzed via RT‐qPCR and 15‐plex Luminex array, at basal conditions and in response to various mucus secretagogues, including phorbol myristate acetate (PMA, positive control), live Entamoeba histolytica ( Eh ), and lysed soluble amebic proteins (SAP). To determine the impact of ER stress, the expression of various stress proteins was quantified by Western blotting basally and following treatment with IL‐22 to alleviate ER stress. To determine which MAPK signalling pathways were altered in the cell lines resulting in differing pro‐inflammatory phenotypes, specific pharmacological inhibitors were used and analyzed by Western blotting. WT goblet cells expressed high levels of the ER stress proteins, ATF4 and GRP78, as compared to MUC2 KO cells, both basally and in response to live Eh . In response to the various mucus secretagogues, PMA, live Eh , and SAP, WT cells expressed higher levels of mRNA transcripts and secreted high amounts of the pro‐inflammatory chemokines, interleukin‐8 (IL‐8), interleukin‐13 (IL‐13) and monocyte chemoattractant protein‐1 (MCP‐1) as compared to MUC2 KO cells. Specifically, IL‐8 secretion was significantly elevated in both cell lines by mitigating ER stress with IL‐22 pre‐treatment. In particular, WT cells showed rapid and elevated phospho‐ERK MAPK signalling responses, whereas the response in MUC2 KO cells was delayed. These results demonstrate that goblet cells under high metabolic ER stress triggered by MUC2 mucin biosynthesis activates the ERK MAPK signalling pathway basally and in response to inflammatory agonists to produce elevated levels of pro‐inflammatory chemokines. In contrast, goblet cells that are genetically deleted of MUC2 showed dysregulated pro‐inflammatory responses and altered MAPK signalling that could dysregulate innate host defences analogous to the pathology observed in Muc2 ‐/‐ littermates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicAmoebic Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207