MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Molecular insights into regulation of PI3Kα

2022· article· en· W4225331892 on OpenAlexafffund
Harish R. Prasad

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsComputational biologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PIK3CA, the gene for the lipid kinase p110α is one of the most frequently mutated oncogenes across all types of cancer. p110α is an enzyme that catalyzes the formation of phosphatidylinositol 3, 4, 5 Triphosphate (PIP 3 ). PIP 3 recruits effector proteins which regulate growth, proliferation and motility. Due to this role as a master cell regulator, the activity of p110α is maintained in an inactive confirmation and is only activated downstream of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases (RTKs) and RAS family of GTPases. p110α is maintained in an inactive confirmation through interactions with its regulatory subunit as well as inhibitory contacts with the C‐terminus. However, oncogenic mutations in p110α breaks these inhibitory interactions and drives hyperactivity without the need for activation signals leading to uncontrolled cell growth. We provide molecular insights into the regulation of oncogenic mutants of p110α using Hydrogen‐Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry (HDX‐MS). HDX‐MS reveals the dynamic changes between the natural cytosolic state and fully‐active membrane bound states of the enzyme. We find unique molecular mechanisms regulating how mutants at the c‐terminus activate lipid kinase activity (H1047R, M1043L, G1049R and N1068KLKR). Using extensive biophysical tools, biochemical assays, and MD simulations, we have tested the oncogenic potential of these mutations. Our results elucidates a unifying theory towards the regulation of PI3Kα and how oncogenic mutations drive hyperactivity. This will aid in understanding the regulation of PI3Kα and in developing isoform specific inhibitors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer→French-language works237,207→