MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Exercise increases the expression of glucose transport and lipid metabolism genes at optimum level time point 6 hours post exercise in rat skeletal muscle

2022· article· en· W4225371848 on OpenAlexaff
Oladapo F. Fagbohun, Jitcy C. Joseph

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGLUT4EndocrinologyInternal medicineGlucose transporterLipid metabolismType 2 diabetesGlucose uptakeCarnitineInsulin resistanceCarnitine palmitoyltransferase ICarbohydrate metabolismPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptorBiologyInsulinDiabetes mellitusChemistryBeta oxidationMedicineMetabolismReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aim Type 2 diabetes constitutes more than 90% of all diabetic cases and is characterized by persistent increase in glucose level in the blood (hyperglycemia) as well as lipid and protein metabolic disorders that may induce insulin resistance. Increased lipid levels induce type 2 diabetes by interfering with the insulin‐signaling pathway responsible for glucose transport. Individuals who suffer from type 2 diabetes are usually characterized in part by down‐regulation of glucose transport genes such as glut4 and down‐regulation of mitochondrial lipid oxidizing genes such as carnitine palmitoyltransferase‐1 (Cpt‐1). Nuclear respiratory factor (NRF)‐1 is a mitochondrial transcriptional factor which is shown to be involved in glucose transport and is set as a potential therapeutic modality in the treatment and management of type 2 diabetes. In this study, we sought to access NRF‐1 and its target genes expression during exercise which is crucial in glucose transport and lipid oxidation. Method Five to six weeks old male Wistar rats were exercised to identify the time point for an optimum increase in the levels of NRF‐1 and its target genes. Gastrocnemius muscles were harvested after 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 15 h post‐exercise and non‐exercise rats (control). Primers were used to amplify the region of following genes; Nrf‐1, glut 4, carnitine palmitoyl transferase (Cpt‐1 & Cpt‐2), peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor gamma co‐activator 1 (Pgc‐1), mef2a, and acetyl‐CoA carboxylase‐1 (Acc‐1). Relative mRNA expression was normalized to the Actin reference gene. Results From the result of this study, cpt‐1, Nrf‐1, mef2a, glut4, cpt2, and Pgc‐1 showed 2.5, 8, 1.2, 4.1, 4.6, 3.5‐folds increases respectively after 8h post‐exercise compared with control whereas Acc‐1 showed a 3.1‐fold decrease in gene expression ratio after 6 h post‐exercise compared with control. Nrf‐1 binding to cpt‐1 and mef2a increased with 3 and 3.5‐folds respectively 6h post‐exercise compared with control. Conclusion Conclusively, nrf‐1 was increased by exercise and also, it's binding to target genes which has huge implications in ameliorating type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer→French-language works237,207→