Direct evidence of a sympathetically‐mediated cardio‐inotropic response to baroreceptor unloading in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rationale The baroreflex is a cardio‐autonomic reflex that is responsible for buffering acute oscillations in blood pressure. Contemporary evidence suggests that, when stimulated, baroreceptors activate a neural reflex arc via two efferent pathways: the vascular‐sympathetic arm to control peripheral resistance, and the cardio‐vagal arm to control heart rate. However, since sympathetic post‐ganglionic fibres innervate both the vasculature and left ventricle (LV) it follows that the heart may also contribute to hemodynamic regulation during baroreceptor unloading through alterations in cardiac inotropy, yet to our knowledge this has not been empirically tested using a load‐independent index of LV inotropy. Aim 1) To determine whether there is an increase in LV inotropy in response to baroreceptor unloading, and 2) to parse out whether this response occurs via sympathetic activation, parasympathetic withdrawal, or a combination of the two. Hypotheses There will be an increase in LV inotropy in response to baroreceptor unloading, and this response will occur via activation of the sympathetic nervous system. Methods 10 male Wistar rats were anesthetized (urethane) and instrumented with a LV pressure‐volume catheter to measure the maximal rate of pressure generation for a given end‐diastolic volume (dP/dt max –EDV mmHg·s ‐1 ·µl ‐1 ) as a load‐independent metric of cardiac inotropic function. Each rat was then placed in a customized servo‐controlled lower‐body negative pressure (LBNP) chamber that was programmed to reduce mean arterial pressure (MAP) by 10% for 60s to mechanically unload baroreceptors. The protocol was repeated in the same animal following infusions of lactated ringers (control), esmolol (β1 adrenergic receptor antagonist; blocks cardiac sympathetic transmission), atropine (muscarinic receptor antagonist; blocks cardiac parasympathetic transmission), and esmolol+atropine (full cardiac autonomic blockade). Between‐condition differences in LV inotropy were assessed using mixed‐models with Bonferroni corrected post‐hoc pairwise comparisons. Results Under control conditions, dP/dt max –EDV increased significantly (25.8±4.9 vs 29.9±6.7 mmHg·s ‐1 ·µl ‐1 ; p=0.002) during unloading. Sympathetic and full cardiac blockade significantly reduced baseline dP/dt max –EDV (10.8±2.1 and 13.5±3.0 mmHg·s ‐1 ·µl ‐1 , respectively; p<0.001 for both), and abolished the response to baroreceptor unloading (10.6±2.1 and 14.3±4.0 mmHg·s ‐1 ·µl ‐1 , respectively; p=0.999 for both). Parasympathetic blockade had no effect on baseline dP/dt max –EDV (26.1±5.5 mmHg·s ‐1 ·µl ‐1 ; p=0.999) and the increase in dP/dt max –EDV during baroreceptor unloading was maintained (30.5±8.3 mmHg·s ‐1 ·µl ‐1 ; p<0.001). Conclusion These results provide direct evidence of a sympathetically‐mediated increase in cardiac inotropic function in response to baroreceptor unloading in rats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".