Tracking the ancestral functions of erythropoietin: neuroprotection & mitochondria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has long been thought that erythropoietin (Epo) is exclusively involved in erythropoiesis; now, it is known that EPO in mammal's brain plays key roles in the development, maintenance, protection, and repair of the nervous system. Also, EPO in mammals contributes to the efficient use of oxygen through the regulation of mitochondrial bioenergetic. Remarkably, a similar neuroprotective impact of recombinant human EPO (rhEPO) has been found in the brain of grasshoppers, raising questions about the evolutive origin of the EPO and its generic molecular function. The objective of this study is to show that the neuroprotective effect of rhEPO in insects involves the regulation of mitochondrial functions. The experiments were performed in crickets ( Acheta domesticus ). These insects were exposed under normoxia and hypoxia (5 days; 6% O2) conditions. Before experimentation, the animals were treated with EPO (30 IU/ml ‐ intra‐lymphatic injection) or PBS, as a control. The brains of the crickets were removed, and then we determined the mitochondrial respiration and production of mitochondrial ROS using our system oxygraphy ‐ 2K (ORORBOROS). Our results show that compares to normoxia; hypoxia significantly reduces mitochondrial respiration of complexes 1 and 1&2. On the other hand, the treatment of EPO in hypoxia, despite significantly increasing these parameters, does not recover the levels of mitochondrial respiration under normoxic conditions. In addition, the activity of complex IV (an indicator of the number of mitochondria) does not vary significantly between any of the treatments. Furthermore, we observed that while hypoxia did not significantly affect H 2 O 2 production, the treatment with EPO increased ROS production under normoxic but not hypoxic conditions. Our data suggest that rhEPO regulates in some way the mitochondrial respiration and ROS production in the brain of crickets. Considering that insects appeared during a geological period (Cambrian explosion) in which the atmospheric O2 was increasing, which could cause great oxidative stress due to the change in the metabolism of these animals, this molecule would have appeared as a regulator of mitochondrial functions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".