MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225384189 · doi:10.1038/s42003-022-03379-9

Mapping transgene insertion sites reveals the α-Cre transgene expression in both developing retina and olfactory neurons

2022· article· en· W4225384189 on OpenAlexafffund
Yimeng Fan, Wenyue Chen, Ran Wei, Qiang Wei, Joel D. Pearson, Tao Yu, Rod Bremner, Danian Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications Biology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Canadian institutionsSinai Health SystemLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTransgeneBiologyPAX6Olfactory marker proteinGenetically modified mouseOlfactory systemLocus (genetics)Olfactory receptorRetinalRetinaGeneticsGeneMolecular biologyCell biologyNeuroscienceTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Tg(Pax6-cre,GFP) 2Pgr ( α-Cre ) mouse is a commonly used Cre line thought to be retinal-specific. Using targeted locus amplification (TLA), we mapped the insertion site of the transgene, and defined primers useful to deduce zygosity. Further analyses revealed four tandem copies of the transgene. The insertion site mapped to clusters of vomeronasal and olfactory receptor genes. Using R26R and Ai14 Cre reporter mice, we confirmed retinal Cre activity, but also detected expression in Gα 0 + olfactory neurons. Most α-Cre + olfactory neurons do not express Pax6, implicating the influence of neighboring regulatory elements. RT-PCR and buried food pellet test did not detect any effects of the transgene on flanking genes in the nasal mucosa and retina. Together, these data precisely map α-Cre , show that it does not affect surrounding loci, but reveal previously unanticipated transgene expression in olfactory neurons. The α-Cre mouse can be a valuable tool in both retinal and olfactory research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.308
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.012 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications BiologySame topicOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesFrench-language works237,207