MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Intracellular Superoxide Radical Formation Decreases 6‐Mercaptopurine Uptake by MOLT‐4 Leukemia Cells

2022· article· en· W4225394234 on OpenAlexaff
Nicholas M. Ruel, Kerrylei Jabilona, Nicholas Yamamoto, James R. Hammond

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOxidative stressChemistrySuperoxide dismutasePharmacologyLeukemiaMenadioneCancer cellIntracellularBiochemistryOxidative phosphorylationCancerBiologyImmunologyMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common cancer associated with childhood. 6‐Mercaptopurine (6‐MP) is a nucleobase analog drug used in the maintenance treatment phase of ALL. 6‐MP has numerous side‐effects associated with its use, which has both short‐term and long‐term implications which can impact patient compliance (especially in children). Our lab has established that SLC43A3, which encodes for the equilibrative nucleobase transporter 1 (ENBT1), is expressed in leukemia cells and transports 6‐MP. However, its modes of regulation are yet to be elucidated. A previous study in microvascular endothelial cells demonstrated that nucleobase uptake via ENBT1 was significantly decreased upon exposure to oxidative stress. Oxidative stress is very prevalent in cancer, including leukemia, suggesting that it could impact ENBT1 function and thus 6‐MP uptake and therapeutic activity. Hypothesis ENBT1 function will be reduced by oxidative stress and affect the cytotoxic efficacy of 6‐MP in leukemia cells. Methods The MOLT‐4 leukemia cell line was used for all experiments. Cell viability was assessed via the MTT assay. [ 14 C]6‐MP was used to determine the functional kinetics of ENBT1 using an oil‐stop centrifugation assay. Compounds used for the studies on oxidative stress were tert‐butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP) and menadione (oxygen‐free radical generators). TBHP causes extracellular induction of oxidative stress, while menadione is primarily through an intracellular mechanism called redox cycling. Mn(III)tetrakis(1‐methyl‐4‐pyridyl)porphyrin (MnTMPyP) (superoxide dismutase mimetic) and N‐acetylcysteine (NAC) (antioxidant) were used to combat the effects caused by TBHP or menadione. Results Incubation of cells in TBHP and menadione for 30 min at 37℃ decreased cell viability only at the highest concentrations tested (100 ‐ 400 µM) (400 µM: 86 ± 4% and 72 ± 6%, respectively) Incubation with TBHP and menadione for 24 hours led to a greater loss of cell viability (Log EC 50 : ‐3.9 ± 0.1 and ‐4.3 ± 0.1, respectively). TBHP did not alter ENBT1‐mediated 6‐MP uptake. However, incubation with menadione at 100 µM for 30 min at 37℃ significantly decreased ENBT1‐mediated 6‐MP uptake (V max : Control – 77 ± 3 pmol/µL/sec; Menadione – 57 ± 3 pmol/µL/sec). The addition of the free radical scavenger MnTMPyP did not reverse the decrease caused by menadione. However, the addition of 1mM NAC caused a significant reversal of the reduction in 6‐MP uptake produced by menadione (V max : Menadione – 46 ± 2 pmol/µL/sec; Menadione + NAC – 55 ± 2 pmol/µL/sec). Conclusions Menadione but not TBHP caused a significant decrease in ENBT1 functional activity, suggesting it was due to intracellular superoxide formation, thus supporting our hypothesis. The reduction caused by menadione could be reversed with NAC. This study confirms that ENBT1 function, and thus 6‐MP uptake by leukemia cells, is modified by oxidative stress, thus opening up potential therapeutic avenues in ALL treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207