Identification of microRNA Targets in colorectal cancer through Data Sequencing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer‐related mortality globally. MicroRNAs (miRNAs, miRs), a class of small non‐coding RNA molecules, have demonstrated important roles in carcinogenesis and its progression through the regulation of the epithelialmesenchymal transition (EMT), oncogenic signaling pathways, and metastasis. Despite the increase in miRNA studies and extensive analyzes of their expression, the role and function of many individual miRNAs in CRC remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to identify miRNA targets in CRC through data sequencing, which could be a solid prognostic prediction tool and help clinical strategy. Methods CRC gene expression data sets were collected from the public database, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). In addition, web‐based tools were used to explore TCGA data, specifically the one developed by the Broad Institute TCGA GDAC Firehose, which provides data sets, algorithms, and analysis results standardized for TCGA. This pipeline has the following steps: The CLR (Context Likelihood of Relatedness) approach is applied to infer putative miRNA regulatory connections: gene; miRNA filtering: gene pairs based on Pearson's correlation (<= ‐0.3); and miRNA filtering: gene pairs based on predicted interactions in three sequence prediction databases (Miranda, Pictar, Targetscan). The CLR algorithm was applied on 617 miRs and 18012 mRNAs across 220 samples. After 2 filtering steps, the number of 9 miR:genes pairs were detected. Results The initial search with the term “Colorectal adenocarcinoma”, “COADREAD” yielded 631 cases. After the analysis of these samples, data on the significance miR:gene pairs were obtained and Table 1 shows the results of miR:gene pairs with corr < ‐0.30 and predicted interactions in three sequence prediction databases. About the miRNA connections, Table 2 shows all miRNA hubs with their associated genes in the putative direct target network. Finally, about gene connections, Table 3 shows all gene hubs with their associated miRNAs in the putative direct target network. Conclusion The use of miRNAs as biomarkers for CRC could provide a new and less invasive technique to detect CRC and help determine prognosis. These miRNAs and their targets require further evaluation for a better understanding of their associations, ultimately, with the potential to develop new therapeutic targets. Therefore, it is proposed to develop a screening panel that should consist of multiple miRNAs that would provide a more accurate and efficient screening tool for CRC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".