Domestic crickets ( <i>Acheta domesticus</i> ) as an animal model to study Parkinson's disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Impaired glutamatergic neurotransmission and neuronal metabolic dysfunction are classic alterations in the pathophysiology of Parkinson's disease (PD). The substantia nigra compacta of the brain (the area where the primary pathological lesion is located) is particularly exposed to oxidative stress and metabolic damage. A reduced ability to cope with metabolic demands, possibly related to impaired mitochondrial function, may make the substantia nigra highly vulnerable to the effects of glutamate, which acts as a neurotoxin in the presence of impaired cellular energy metabolism. Taking into account that insects and mammals share a similar molecular architecture in terms of brain function, this work investigated whether domestic crickets (Acheta domesticus) can be used as an animal model for the study of PD. For this, the crickets received an intra‐lymphatic injection (between the second and third tergit of the ventral abdominal segment) of glutamate (10 µl; 2M). Control animals received a similar volume of PBS solution. Twenty‐four hours after treatment, the brains of the animals were dissected. We use our oxygraph‐2K system (OROBOROS Instruments) to determine mitochondrial respiration by activating mitochondrial complexes (CI, CII, CI&II, and CIV) and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Our preliminary results showed that glutamate treatment significantly reduced the respiration of mitochondrial complexes CI, CII, and CI&II, even though the activity of complex IV (an indicator of the number of mitochondria) was not reduced between treatments. On the other hand, mitochondrial production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in glutamate‐treated animals was significantly increased when both mitochondrial complexes I&II were active, but this pattern was reversed when only one of the complexes I or II was active. Because similar alterations have been observed in the brains of mammals with Parkinson's disease, these results strongly suggest that domestic crickets can be used as an animal model to investigate the mitochondrial mechanisms involved in this disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".