Effect of Acute Isometric Handgrip Exercise on Vascular Function in Children with Congenital Heart Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective The reactivity of conduit vessels such as the brachial artery is important in influencing arterial diameter, and subsequently, blood flow. Flow‐mediated dilation (FMD) measures vessel reactivity. The increase in shear stimuli from transient arterial occlusion enhances arterial diameter in an endothelial‐dependent manner, and this is thought to be impaired in individuals with congenital heart disease (CHD). Isometric handgrip (IHG) exercise is a proposed intervention to improve vessel reactivity by optimizing the shear stimuli to provoke changes in arterial diameter. Indeed, IHG training has been found to improve FMD in healthy adults and children. Whether IHG training improves endothelial dysfunction in CHD remains unknown. Improving vessel reactivity in the young becomes increasingly important in optimizing vascular health into adulthood. The effects of acute IHG exercise on the brachial artery were examined in children with CHD. Hypothesis We tested the hypothesis that acute IHG exercise would increase FMD in children with CHD. Methods Four subjects with CHD (mean, 13 ± 1 year, 3 female) completed a single session of 4 × 2 mins of acute IHG (30% maximum voluntary contraction using the right hand) with 1‐min rest intervals between bouts. Before and after IHG exercise, the right brachial artery was imaged with Duplex ultrasound using a 1‐min baseline, 5 mins of forearm circulatory occlusion, followed by 3 mins of cuff deflation. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured continuously. Results Pre‐FMD (baseline) mean arterial pressure (pre: 102 ± 17 mmHg vs. post: 110 ± 16 mmHg, p = 0.496) and heart rate (pre: 75 ± 13 bpm vs. post: 66 ± 5 bpm, p = 0.253) were not different. Baseline brachial artery diameter increased following acute IHG in 3 of 4 subjects (pre: 3.11 ± 0.45 mm vs. post: 3.23 ± 0.39 mm, Cohen’s d = 0.3). Peak shear rate was greater post‐IHG in 3 of 4 subjects (pre: 995 ± 346 sec ‐1 vs. post: 1158 ± 501 sec ‐1 , Cohen’s d = 0.4). FMD% (4.7% vs. 6.3% and 8.2% vs. 10.5%) and FMD% normalized to shear rate area under the curve (AUC) ratio (2.2E‐5 vs. 7.4E‐5 a.u. and 3.1E‐5 vs. 4.3E‐5 a.u., Cohen’s d = 2.0) increased post‐IHG in 2 of 4 subjects. When brachial artery diameter increased, peak shear rate, FMD%, and FMD% normalized to shear rate AUC improved post‐IHG in 2/3 subjects whereas subject four showed a decrease in brachial artery diameter, FMD% and FMD% normalized to shear rate AUC, with the exception of peak shear rate post‐IHG. Conclusion Favorable changes in brachial artery diameter, peak shear rate, FMD% and FMD% normalized to shear rate AUC following acute IHG may be a promising intervention for improving vascular tone and endothelial function in children with CHD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".