Role of HSP90 Family Molecular Chaperone in Regulating Chloroplast Protein Homeostasis and Plant Development in Arabidopsis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chloroplasts carry out photosynthesis in plants and provide most food sources for living organisms. Either divided or differentiated from proplastids and etioplasts, the biogenesis of thylakoid membranes is the hallmark of chloroplast maturation and functionality, and this process requires a large set of photosynthetic proteins that must be synthesized on cytosolic ribosomes and then imported into the chloroplast stroma. Thylakoid lumen proteins travel further through the stroma and then cross the thylakoid membrane through one of the ancestral translocases. Like the cytosolic environment and the other major organelles, a cohort of molecular chaperones and proteases reside within the chloroplast to ensure proper protein homeostasis. We have identified and confirmed the interaction between the essential plastid HSP90 family heat shock protein HSP90C and a thylakoid lumen located photosystem II subunit PsbO1. To understand the biological significance of the interaction, we adopted transgenic approaches, specific HSP90 inhibitors, biochemical and in organello protein transport assays to study how the HSP90 family protein facilitates the representative lumen proteins transport across the thylakoid membrane. Specifically, we showed that the expression of the molecular chaperone is developmentally regulated, and its expression is highly correlated with some photosynthetic proteins while not with the others. Additionally, we demonstrated that HSP90C physically interacts with the thylakoid SEC translocon subunit, and that its chaperone activity is required for efficient PsbO1 transport. We also investigated the signature sequences of different HSP90 subfamily proteins and provided evidence that the chloroplast located HSP90C contains features specialized for some photosynthetic proteins interaction, and thus the chloroplast maturation and functionality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".