MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225420161 · doi:10.1136/bcr-2020-236989

Synchronous colonic B cell lymphoma and adenocarcinoma in an elderly patient treated with R-mini-CHOP followed by resection

2022· article· en· W4225420161 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Schep, Julie Ann Van Koughnett, Vikram Velker, Rohann Correa

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Case Reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCHOPLymphomaChemotherapyAdenocarcinomaInternal medicineStage (stratigraphy)SurgeryOncologyGastroenterologyRadiologyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The simultaneous diagnosis of colonic lymphoma and adenocarcinoma in the same location is rare and presents challenges in its treatment considerations, especially in elderly patients. While previous cases have been described, there is little consistency in treatment regimens, and outcomes are generally poor. We describe the case of a man in his late 80s who presented with primary cecal and colonic B cell lymphoma, treated with R-mini-CHOP chemotherapy, but was found to have a residual adenocarcinoma in the cecum after treatment that was then successfully resected. The patient remains alive and well 3 years postoperation. This case highlights the need to consider lymphoma as a possible diagnosis for any colonic mass, and the need to consider rebiopsy of residual abnormal-appearing tissue postchemotherapy to confirm the diagnosis. Moreover, our report affirms that aggressive, curative-intent treatment with age-adjusted chemotherapy, and subsequent surgical resection is feasible for certain elderly patients with dual malignant diagnoses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score0.751

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Case ReportsSame topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207