Three-dimensional crustal and upper-mantle resistivity structure of Alberta, Canada: implications for Precambrian tectonics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY This paper describes the first detailed 3-D study of the Alberta basement using the magnetotelluric (MT) method. Long-period MT data were used to generate a 3-D electrical resistivity model of the crust and upper mantle beneath Alberta. The Western Canada Sedimentary Basin was imaged as a low-resistivity layer. A number of crustal and upper-mantle conductors were imaged and include: (1) the Red Deer conductor, (2) the Kiskatinaw conductor, (3) a conductor coincident with the Kimiwan oxygen isotope anomaly, (4) the southern Alberta–British Columbia conductor, (5) the Loverna block conductor and (6) a conductor beneath the Birch Mountain kimberlite field. Conductors (3) and (6) are newly identified in this study. All of these conductors can be related to past tectonic events associated with the assembly of Laurentia and subsequent kimberlite magmatism. The depth of the lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary across Alberta varies from 150 to 300 km as defined from the 100 Ω m contour. Furthermore, the Snowbird tectonic zone in Alberta is characterized by a thick, resistive lithosphere. Similarly, the diamondiferous Buffalo Head Hills kimberlite field is imaged with a thick, resistive lithosphere, both may indicate depletion. In contrast, the Birch Mountain kimberlite field is underlain by a pronounced conductor that extends through the lithosphere and may be the result of metasomatism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".