Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities ofPulicaria Odora Extract
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Asteraceae family, of which Pulicaria genus, plays a remarkable role in the development of drugs used in modern medicine. Leaf extracts of Pulicaria odora harvested in Bejaia were evaluated for their antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Methods: HCl method at three different wavelengths 280, 320 and 360 nm was carried out for total phenolics content and characterized by ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) analysis. Antimicrobial activity was evaluated using four bacterial strains (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria innocua) and three molds (Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus niger and Trichoderma reesei). Four antioxidant tests (ORAC, ABTS, DPPH and FRAP) were performed. Results: The extracts had high total polyphenols (305 mg catechin equivalents [CE]), flavonols (56 mg quercetin equivalents [QE]), tannins (77 mg CE) and tartaric acids (38 mg caffeic acid equivalents [CAE]) per g dry matter contents. UPLC analysis of the 70 % ethanol extracts showed abundant phenolic acids (protocatechuic, chlorogenic and caffeic acids). Pulicaria odora extracts exhibited good antimicrobial activity against bacterial (~18 mm inhibition zones) and molds (11.3-17.3 mm) strains. Conclusion: All extracts displayed good antioxidant activity and effective antimicrobial activity, which allow its use as a conservative agent or therapeutic remedy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it