Expressions of Serum lncRNAs in Diabetic Retinopathy – A Potential Diagnostic Tool
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With increasing incidence of diabetes worldwide, there is an ever-expanding number of patients with chronic diabetic complications such as diabetic retinopathy (DR), one of the leading causes of blindness in the working age population. Early screening for the onset and severity of DR is essential for timely intervention. With recent advancements in genomic technologies, epigenetic alterations in DR are beginning to unravel. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which are key epigenetic mediators, have demonstrated implications in several (DR) related processes. Based on the previous research, we have developed a serum-based, multi-panel PCR test using 9 lncRNAs ( ANRIL , MALAT1 , WISPER , ZFAS1 , H19 , HOTAIR , HULC , MEG3 , and MIAT ) to identify and validate whether this panel could be used as a diagnostic and prognostic tool for DR. We initially used a cell culture model (human retinal endothelial cells) and confirmed that 25 mM glucose induces upregulations of ANRIL , HOTAIR , HULC , MALAT1 , and ZFAS1 , and downregulation of H19 compared to 5 mM glucose controls. Then as an initial proof-of-concept, we tested vitreous humor and serum samples from a small cohort of non-diabetic (N=10) and diabetic patients with proliferative retinopathy (PDR, N=11) and measured the levels of the 9 lncRNAs. Differential expressions of lncRNAs were found in the vitreous and serum of patients and showed significant correlations. We expanded our approach and assessed the same lncRNAs using samples from a larger cohort of diabetic (n= 59; M/F:44/15) and non-diabetic patients (n= 11; M/F:4/7). Significant increased lncRNA expressions of ANRIL , H19 , HOTAIR , HULC , MIAT , WISPER and ZFAS1 were observed in the serum of diabetic patients (with varying stages of DR) compared to non-diabetics. No significant correlations were demonstrated between lncRNA expressions and creatinine or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels. Using ROC and further analyses, we identified distinct lncRNA phenotype combinations, which may be used to identify patients with DR. Data from this study indicate that a panel of serum lncRNAs may be used for a potential screening test for DR. Further large-scale studies are needed to validate this notion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".