ANALYSIS OF SPECIFIC PARAMETERS FOR SKIN TUMOR CLASSIFICATION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the last years, computer vision-based diagnosis systems have been widely used in several hospitals and dermatology clinics, aiming mostly at the early detection of malignant melanoma tumor, which is among the most frequent types of skin cancer, versus other types of nonmalignant cutaneous diseases. They grow in melanocytes, the cells responsible for pigmentation. This type of cancer is increasing rapidly and its related mortality rate is increasing more modestly, and inversely proportional to the tumor’s thickness. The mortality rate can be decreased by earlier detection of suspicious lesions and better prevention. In this work, we are interested in extracting all specific attributes which can be used for computer-aided diagnosis of melanoma. In the first step of the proposed work, we applied the Dull Razor [Lee T et al., Dullrazor: A software approach to hair removal from images, Cancer Control Research, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 533–543, 1997] technique to images to reduce the influence of small structures, hairs, bubbles, light reflection. In the second step, a new fuzzy level set algorithm is proposed in order to facilitate the medical image segmentation task. It is able to directly evolve from the initial segmentation proposed that uses a spatial fuzzy clustering approach. The controlling parameters of the level set evolution are also estimated from the results of the fuzzy clustering step. This step is essential to characterize the shape of the lesion and also to locate the tumor to be analyzed. In this paper, we have also treated the necessity to extract all the specific attributes used to develop a characterization methodology that enables specialists to take the best possible diagnosis. For this purpose, our proposal relies largely on visual observation of the tumor while dealing with some characteristics as color, texture or form. The method used in this paper is called ABCD. It requires calculating four factors: Asymmetry ([Formula: see text], Border ([Formula: see text], Color ([Formula: see text], and Diversity ([Formula: see text]. Finally, these parameters are used to construct a classification module based on artificial neural network for the recognition of malignant melanoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".