Convergent selective signaling impairment exposes the pathogenicity of latrophilin-3 missense variants linked to inheritable ADHD susceptibility
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Latrophilin-3 (Lphn3; also known as ADGRL3) is a member of the adhesion G Protein Coupled Receptor subfamily, which participates in the stabilization and maintenance of neuronal networks by mediating intercellular adhesion through heterophilic interactions with transmembrane ligands. Polymorphisms modifying the Lphn3 gene are associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and its persistence into adulthood. How these genetic alterations affect receptor function remains unknown. Here, we conducted the functional validation of distinct ADHD-related Lphn3 variants bearing mutations in the receptor's adhesion motif-containing extracellular region. We found that all variants tested disrupted the ability of Lphn3 to stabilize intercellular adhesion in a manner that was distinct between ligands classes, but which did not depend on ligand-receptor interaction parameters, thus pointing to altered intrinsic receptor signaling properties. Using G protein signaling biosensors, we determined that Lphn3 couples to Gαi1, Gαi2, Gαs, Gαq, and Gα13. However, all ADHD-related receptor variants consistently lacked intrinsic as well as ligand-dependent Gα13 coupling efficiency while maintaining unaltered coupling to Gαi, Gαs, and Gαq. Consistent with these alterations, actin remodeling functions as well as actin-relevant RhoA signaling normally displayed by the constitutively active Lphn3 receptor were impeded by select receptor variants, thus supporting additional signaling defects. Taken together, our data point to Gα13 selective signaling impairments as representing a disease-relevant pathogenicity pathway that can be inherited through Lphn3 gene polymorphisms. This study highlights the intricate interplay between Lphn3 GPCR functions and the actin cytoskeleton in modulating neurodevelopmental cues related to ADHD etiology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".