Breastfeeding practices for infants with inherited metabolic disorders: A survey of registered dietitians in the United States and Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Breast milk is considered the optimal first food for infants. Breastfeeding infants with inherited metabolic disorders (IMDs) is complex due to the critical need to manage intake of specific macronutrients depending on the type of IMD. Objective: To describe current practices of registered dietitians (RD) who treat patients with IMDs regarding the incorporation of breastmilk into disease management. Design: Cross-sectional survey.Participants/setting:online survey conducted in December 2020 of 66 RDs who treat patients with IMDs in the United States and Canada.Main outcome measures:the survey focused on personal demographics, clinic characteristics, institutional feeding protocols for infants with IMDs, confidence in working with breastfeeding parents of infants with IMDs, and knowledge about breastfeeding with questions derived from the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitudes Scale.Statistical analysis performed:.Fisher's exact test was used for comparisons. Results: Most RDs were confident or very confident in their ability to provide nutritional guidance for breastfeeding infants with IMDs. Half of the participants reported that they had received training on breastfeeding of infants of IMDs. For infants with phenylketonuria (PKU), most RDs include breastfeeding as part of nutritional management. Breastfeeding is less likely to be used in the management of infants with other aminoacidopathies and fatty acid oxidation disorders. Use of measured expressed breastmilk was preferred, including for aminoacidopathies other than PKU, organic acidemias, and fatty acid oxidation disorders. Knowledge about breastfeeding varied. Less than half of RDs referred mothers to a lactation specialist somewhat regularly or frequently. Conclusions: Our survey found variation in experience, training, and use of breastfeeding-related nutritional management protocols in IMDs. A lack of formal training programs for the nutritional management of IMDs may account for some of this variation. Future research, including the collection of more detailed disorder-specific data, could help contribute to the development of clinical practice guidelines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".