MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4225886677 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1412363/v1

Therapeutic plasma exchange in multiple sclerosis patients with an aggressive relapse–an observational analysis in a high–volume center

2022· preprint· en· W4225886677 on OpenAlexaff
Radovan Bunganic, Šárka Blahutová, Kamila Žondra Revendová, Olga Zapletalová, Pavel Hradílek, Radomíra Hrdličková, Aravind Ganesh, Zuzana Čermáková, Michal Bar, Ondřej Volný

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMultiple sclerosisInternal medicineSingle CenterCorticosteroidMethylprednisoloneMcDonald criteriaObservational studyExpanded Disability Status ScaleSurgeryImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: An evidence–based treatment for a Multiple Sclerosis (MS) relapse is an intravenous administration of 3–5g of Methylprednisolone. In case of insufficient effect or corticosteroids intolerance, the therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is indicated.Objective: To assess the clinical effect of TPE in treatment of relapse in patients with relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS).Methods: We enrolled 155 patients meeting the following criteria: (1) age >18, (2) RRMS according to the McDonald´s 2017 criteria, (3) MS relapse and insufficient effect of corticosteroids/corticosteroids intolerance, (4) baseline EDSS <8. Exclusion criteria: (1) progressive form of disease, (2) history of previous TPE. Following parameters were monitored: EDSS changes (before and after corticosteroid treatment, before and after TPE; EDSS after TPE was assessed at the next clinical follow–up at the MS Center), and improvement of EDSS according to the number of procedures and baseline severity of relapse.Results: 115 females (74%) and 40 males (26%) were included. The median age was 41 years (IQR 33–47)–131 patients underwent the pulse corticosteroids treatment and TPE, while 24 patients underwent only TPE without any previous corticosteroid treatment. Median baseline EDSS was 4.5 (IQR 3.5–5.5), median EDSS after finishing steroids was 4.5 (IQR 4.0–5.5). EDSS prior to the TPE was 4.5 (IQR 4–6), EDSS after TPE was 4.5 (IQR 3.5–5.5). We observed a significant improvement in the EDSS after TPE (p<0.001). Sex differences were seen in TPE effectiveness, with average improvement of EDSS in females being –0.43 (SD±0.69) and in males being –0.069 (SD±1.05), p=0.048. There was no difference in EDSS improvement by age category: 18–30 years, 31–40 years, 41–50 years, >50 (p=0.94), nor by total TPE count (p=0.91). Conclusion: In this retrospective study of patients with an aggressive relapse and insufficient effect of intravenous corticosteroid treatment, a significant effect of TPE on EDSS improvement was observed. There was no significant difference in TPE effectivity according to the number of procedures, age, nor severity of a relapse. In this cohort, TPE was more effective in females.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.252
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies→French-language works237,207→