MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

EFFECT OF PONCEAU 4R FOOD DYE ON HUMANS AND ANIMALS: THE LITERATURE REVIEW

2022· article· en· W4225947041 on OpenAlex
G. А. Yeroshenko, O. V. Kinash, Ольга Дмитрівна Лисаченко, A. S. Hryhorenko, I. M. Donets, Олена Борисівна Рябушко, O. V. Klepets

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Problems Biology and Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicDye analysis and toxicity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFood scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modern manufacturers prefer synthetic dyes due to their chemical stability, bright color, and low cost. Azo dyes are the most widely used in industry. The most popular are the dyes of red and yellow colors, among them– ponceau 4R. However, different countries of the world have different legislative norms regarding the permissibility of using ponceau 4R in medicine and food production. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) established the value of a safe daily intake of synthetic dyes based on available clinical trials. However, it should be noted that EFSA documents are based on the results of the works which contain information concerning consumption rates of particular dyes and food additives, but not their combinations. Ponceau 4R is banned in the United States and Canada. It is considered that the presence of dyes in the drug’s composition for pediatric practice causes allergic reactions in children. Pollution of water and soil by synthetic food dyes is potentially dangerous to living things from different parts of the food chain. The negative effect of ponceau 4R dye on crustaceans, freshwater fish, and cultivated plants has been experimentally proven. The permissible daily intake of ponso 4R colorant for humans is 0–4 mg/kg body weight per day. Ponceau 4R is broken down in the gastrointestinal tract with the participation of anaerobic microflora, followed by absorption of metabolites formed in the intestine. According to various authors, ponceau 4R in combination with other dietary supplements caused structural changes in the duodenum of white rats, and also influenced the behavioral responses of experimental animals and their offsprings (anxiety, reduced adaptive responses, decreased activity, and emotional disturbances). It has been established that ponceau 4R in combination with other food dyes has the ability to cause inflammatory reactions and oxidative stress. A significant proportion of scientific publications point to the problem of qualitative and quantitative determination of ponceau 4R, amaranth, tartrazine, and other colorants in food and medicines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it