MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4225990138 · doi:10.22215/etd/2022-14953

Investigating the Contribution of Agouti-Related Peptide (AGRP) on Ghrelin’s Ability to Promote Social Interaction in Mice

2022· dissertation· en· W4225990138 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmad Alftieh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGhrelinGrowth hormone secretagogue receptorEndocrinologyInternal medicineSecretagogueReceptorAgonistNeuropeptide Y receptorNeuropeptidePsychologyHypothalamusPeptide hormoneBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ghrelin is a stomach-derived peptide that increases food intake by acting as an endogenous ligand for growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR).GHSR is abundantly expressed in the brain with high expression found in agouti-related peptide (AGRP) and neuropeptide-Y (NPY) neurons within the hypothalamic arcuate (ARC) nucleus.Recent data suggests that, in addition to increasing food intake, ghrelin promotes social interaction whereas ghrelin receptor antagonists increase social vigilance.In this present thesis, we aimed to investigate the effects of ghrelin on promoting social interaction in mice and the role of AGRP in mediating these effects.Sixty-three male and female C57BL/6J mice were assigned to groups receiving intraperitoneal (IP) injections of saline or ghrelin (1 mg/kg of ghrelin in .1cc of isotonic saline) followed by injections of saline or the MC3/4 receptor agonist melanotan-II (100ug of MTII in .1cc of isotonic saline) which competes with AGRP, an endogenous antagonist to the MC3/4 receptors.Thirty minutes later, mice were tested on a social interaction test to investigate how these drug treatments affected social behaviors.Results showed that, regardless of sex, ghrelin injected peripherally promotes the motivation for social interaction as reflected by a significant decrease in the latency to approach a novel-conspecific.In contrast, MTII injected peripherally enhanced social vigilance as reflected by a significant increase in the frequency of corner observations.No interaction effects between the two drugs were found, suggesting that ghrelin promotes the motivation for social interaction, and these effects are independent from activation of AGRP neurons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity→French-language works237,207→