MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Temperature Discrepancy with Photoionization Models of the Narrow-Line Region

2022· article· en· W4225999920 on OpenAlexaff
L. Binette, M. Villar‐Martín, G. Magris, M. Martínez-Paredes, Alexandre Alarie, A. Rodríguez-Ardila, I. Villicaña-Pedraza

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Mexicana de Astronomía y Astrofísica · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotoionizationPhysicsLine (geometry)PlasmaAtomic physicsAstrophysicsCoincidenceQuasarIonIonizationGalaxyNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using published work on the narrow-line region of Active Galactic Nuclei, a comparison is carried out among the [OIII] λ4363Å/5007Å ratios (ROIII) observed in quasars, Seyfert 2's and the spatially resolved ENLR plasma. Using the weak [ArIV] λ4711Å/λ4740Å doublet observed by Koski (1978) among Seyfert 2's, we find evidence of a Narrow-Line Region (NLR) populated by low density emission clouds (≲ 104 cm-3). After considering calculations of the [ArIV] and [OIII] ratios that assume a powerlaw distribution of plasma densities, no evidence of collisional deexcitation is found. The plasma temperature that is inferred is 13 500 °K, which is problematic to reproduce with standard photoionization calculations. The simplest interpretation for the near coincidence of the ROIII ratios among the ENLR and Seyfert 2 measurements (ROIII ≃ 0.017) is that the low density regime applies to both plasmas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Mexicana de Astronomía y AstrofísicaSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207