Calculation of the Moment of the Beginning of the Existence of Light in the Universe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The apparent age of the universe is about T » 13.56´109 years. Light is part of our everyday life, but it has not always existed. According to physicists, it began to exist about ~360 000 to 380 000 years after the Big Bang. We calculated the exact moment of the appearance of light based on a new cosmological model shown in 2019. In this model, we make the following hypotheses: 1) The apparent radius of curvature of the universe increases at the velocity of light. 2) Our universe is in rotation on itself. 3) The tangential speed of the universe’s periphery is the same as an electron. 4) Our universe is made of a ″material universe″ imbricated in a ″luminous universe″. With Einstein’s laws of relativity for spinning disks and the addition of speeds, we can establish the moment where the universe became transparent and emitted light. We evaluate that moment to ~361 108 years after the Big Bang. The assumptions used for the calculations reveal some interesting facts about the structure and characteristics of our universe. This article may be a step-stone for other analyses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".