MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4226029629 · doi:10.1093/fs/knac097

<i>Life in Revolutionary France</i> . Edited by Mette Harder and Jennifer Ngaire Heuer <i>Life in Revolutionary France</i> . Edited by HarderMette and HeuerJennifer Ngaire. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021. 424 pp., ill.

2022· article· en· W4226029629 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter McPhee

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoriographyPoliticsNarrativeHistorySociologyGender studiesArt historyMedia studiesPolitical scienceArtLawLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Judging from this sparkling collection, the current state of historiography of the French Revolution is healthy indeed. Social and cultural history has come a long way since Norman Hampson’s pioneering A Social History of the French Revolution, first published in 1963 (and still in print). The sixteen contributors include both established and emerging scholars, twelve of them women, heavily concentrated in the USA and the UK, with solitary contributors from Canada, New Zealand, and France itself. In their engaging overview of the volume, the editors Mette Harder and Jennifer Ngaire Heuer avoid grand statements about their aims beyond offering ‘a collection of stories of individual and collective experience’ to illuminate the sensations of daily life (p. 12), although they suggest surprisingly that the Revolution ‘anticipated later regimes’ “totalitarian” intrusions into people’s everyday existence’ (p. 2). They also eschew conventional narrative approaches, instead grouping the eclectic contributions around three broad themes. The first is on revolutionary identities and spaces (Jill Maciak Walshaw on rural politics; Laura Talamante on women in Marseille; Hannah Callaway on landlords and tenants in Paris; Christopher Tozzi on the army; Abigail Coppins and Heuer on French Caribbean prisoners of war in Britain). Part Two, on revolutionary justice, has an overview by Claire Cage, then closer studies of surveillance, by Ralph Kingston; prostitution, by Clyde Plumauzille; and the ‘right to health’, by Sean M. Quinlan. The final section, on revolutionary experience, practices, and sensations, ranges widely through discussions of food, by E. C. Spary; Anglo-American imaginings of violence in France, by Ashli White; a broad survey of religion, by Jonathan Smyth; miniature paintings done in prisons, by Sophie Matthiesson; and the lives of parents and children, by Siân Reynolds. This original and illuminating collection will be a rich resource for students and, with its extensive notes and reference, for researchers looking for the current state of our knowledge in multiple fields. Every contribution is accompanied by an illustrative primary source, all well-chosen and sometimes captivating. In Callaway’s words, ‘information about daily life in the past can come from unexpected sources’ (p. 82), in her case from detail in disputes about tenancy agreements when landlords emigrated. There are two limitations to the collection. One is that, while the editors are well aware that many historians now highlight the Thermidorians’ post facto creation of ‘the reign of Terror’ out of the haphazard crisis measures of 1793–94, in general the contributors adhere to time-worn conceptions of ‘the Terror’ as deliberate state policy made ‘the order of the day’ by Jacobin ‘architects’. The second is more important: after Walshaw’s probing chapter, the 85 per cent of French people who inhabited France’s small towns and villages disappear from the stage. There are innovative studies of working women in Marseille, Caribbean prisoners of war in Britain, and the children of prominent revolutionaries, but the collection is otherwise confined to Paris. Nevertheless, this is an outstanding, often brilliant, collection which deserves recognition and frequent consultation for its refreshing insights into the myriad worlds of revolutionary experience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench Studies→Same topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis→French-language works237,207→