MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226061542 · doi:10.3985/jjsmcwm.33.54

Environmental Impact Assessment of Nationwide Introduction of Plant Biomass Mixed Dehydration Systems at Wastewater Treatment Plants

2022· article· en· W4226061542 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetallurgy and Material Science
Canadian institutionsResearch & Development Corporation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiomass (ecology)Environmental scienceDehydrationWaste managementAgronomyChemistryEngineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本稿では,ベルトプレス,スクリュープレス,遠心分離脱水機により消化汚泥を脱水している全国の下水処理場を対象に,未利用の植物系バイオマスを下水処理場で受け入れ,下水汚泥の脱水助剤として利用することを想定し,システム全体における温室効果ガス排出量を対象とした環境影響評価を行なった。 その結果,脱水ケーキを下水処理場内で焼却処分する場合,既存の方法と比較して各脱水機で 7.8~12 % 温室効果ガス排出量を削減でき,下水処理場外で処分する場合 7.1~7.7 % 削減できる可能性が示された。凝集剤使用量を削減して本技術を導入した場合は,それぞれ 5.8~6.3 %,12~22 % の削減効果があることが示された。植物系バイオマス混合脱水システムは,未利用の植物系バイオマスの有効利用方法として活用でき,下水処理場における汚泥処分費削減に加え,温室効果ガス排出量の削減に寄与できる技術であることが示された。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it