Reduced Reflex Autonomic Responses Following Intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA Injections: A Pre-/Post-study in Individuals With Cervical and Upper Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Urodynamic studies (UDS) can provoke autonomic dysreflexia (AD) in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) at and above the sixth thoracic spinal segment potentially leading to profound vagally mediated heart rate (HR) reductions. In this study, we test the hypothesis that intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections will improve HR and its variability (HRV) responses to UDS in individuals with cervical and thoracic SCI. A total of 19 participants with chronic SCI (5 women, mean age 42.5 ± 7.9 years) with confirmed neurogenic detrusor overactivity underwent UDS before (i.e., baseline) and 1 month after intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA (200 U) injections (post-treatment). Continuous electrocardiography and blood pressure (BP) recordings were used to assess RR-interval, time, and frequency domain metrics of HRV (a surrogate marker of autonomic nervous system activity), and AD pre- and post-treatment. UDS pre-treatment resulted in increased RR-interval as well as time and frequency domain metrics of HRV. Vagally mediated increases in high-frequency (HF) power during UDS were larger in participants with cervical compared to upper thoracic SCI. Post-treatment, UDS had no effect on RR-interval and significantly reduced instances of bradycardia. Furthermore, intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections significantly reduced time domain metrics of HRV and HF power responses to UDS across all participants. Changes in HRV during UDS could be a potential indicator of improved autonomic cardiovascular function following interventions such as intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".