MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4226070900 · doi:10.1370/afm.20.s1.2985

The role of NPs in preventing readmissions and emergency department visits among individuals with complex needs

2022· article· en· W4226070900 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kaitlyn Assadpour, Shelley Doucet

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNursing Roles and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmergency departmentContext (archaeology)MedicineHealth careMedical emergencyIntervention (counseling)Nursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context: As nurse practitioners (NPs) are increasingly integrated into healthcare systems globally, understanding their role in combating prominent healthcare challenges of readmissions and emergency department visits is integral to finding innovative solutions. There is evidence to suggest that access to high-quality continuous care is essential in the prevention of readmissions and emergency department visits for patients with complex care needs. Primary care becomes the ideal intervention point, and the prevention of readmissions and emergency department visits are targeted parameters to measure success. Objective: To examine the role of NPs in preventing hospital readmissions and emergency department visits among patients with complex care needs, from the perspective of patients, NPs, and physicians. Study Design: Qualitative description. Setting: Semi-rural Canadian province, located on the east coast. Within this region, NPs practice as Primary Health Care NPs, with no specializations currently recognized. Population studied: Participants included patients with complex care needs, NPs, and physicians. Results: Three overarching themes and several subthemes emerged, these included: Multifaceted Role (Educator, Gatekeeper, Navigator, and Collaborator), Approach to Care (Anticipatory Care, Flexible and Adaptive, Therapeutic Relationship, Patient-Centred Care, and Holistic Care), and Time as an Asset. Encompassing a variety of roles was found to be critical to preventing hospital readmissions and emergency department visits among patients with complex care needs, however, this alone was not enough. Foundational to combating this issue is an approach to care that that is not only anticipatory and improves accessibility, but also fosters patient engagement and self-management. This approach, combined with the ability to devote time to each patient interaction, allow nurse practitioners to peel back the layers of complexity and explore the “bigger picture”. No one size fits all solution exists to solving the challenges of hospital readmissions and emergency department visits. Conclusion: This study has the potential to inform future practice and policy, as NPs become increasingly integrated into healthcare systems. Examining NPs’ unique contributions to healthcare challenges can potentially inform future deployment of advanced practice nursing roles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.152

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNursing Roles and Practices→French-language works237,207→