MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226113190 · doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ad1a78

The strong coupling constant: State of the art and the decade ahead

2022· article· en· W4226113190 on OpenAlexfundno aff
A. M. Cooper-Sarkar, M. Golterman, Matthias Jamin, G. Zanderighi, Andreas S. Kronfeld, K. Maltman, Alexey V. Nesterenko, R. Perez-Ramos, A. Pich, K. Rabbertz, Peris, S., A. Rodriguez-Sanchez, M Schott, B. G. Shaikhatdenov, J. Bluemlein, A. Vairo, C. Waits, Johannes Heinrich Weber, Kexin Xie

Bibliographic record

VenueDurham Research Online (Durham University) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoGeneralitat ValencianaHigh Energy PhysicsMinisterio de Educación, Cultura y DeporteGeneralitat de CatalunyaCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorOffice of ScienceAustrian Science FundMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesAgence Nationale de la RechercheDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversität WienScience and Technology Facilities CouncilStrongAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsParticle physicsPartonElectroweak interactionHadronQuantum chromodynamicsCoupling constantBosonDeep inelastic scatteringCoupling (piping)ScatteringNuclear physicsInelastic scatteringQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

International audience

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0070.011
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0080.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDurham Research Online (Durham University)Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207