No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Using Distortion Learning and Temporal Attention
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rapid growth of video consumption and multimedia applications has increased the interest of the academia and industry in building tools that can evaluate perceptual video quality. Since videos might be distorted when they are captured or transmitted, it is imperative to develop reliable methods for no-reference video quality assessment (NR-VQA). To date, most NR-VQA models in prior art have been proposed for assessing a specific category of distortion, such as authentic distortions or traditional distortions. Moreover, those developed for both authentic and traditional distortions video databases have so far led to poor performances. This resulted in the reluctance of service providers to adopt multiple NR-VQA approaches, as they prefer a single algorithm capable of accurately estimating video quality in all situations. Furthermore, many existing NR-VQA methods are computationally complex and therefore impractical for various real-life applications. In this paper, we propose a novel deep learning method for NR-VQA based on multi-task learning where the distortion of individual frames in a video and the overall quality of the video are predicted by a single neural network. This enables to train the network with a greater amount and variety of data, thereby improving its performance in testing. Additionally, our method leverages temporal attention to select the frames of a video sequence which contribute the most to its perceived quality. The proposed algorithm is evaluated on five publicly-available video quality assessment (VQA) databases containing traditional and authentic distortions. Results show that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art on traditional distortion databases such as LIVE VQA and CSIQ video, while also delivering competitive performance on databases containing authentic distortions such as KoNViD-1k, LIVE-Qualcomm and CVD2014.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".