The 2019 canadian abortion provider survey
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Context: Recently, updated Canadian surgical and medical abortion practice guidelines were released, mifepristone was approved by Health Canada for first trimester medical abortion (FTMA) as a regular prescription, and nurse practitioners (NPs) began to independently provide abortion care. These changes enabled a shift for abortion provision into primary care. Objective: (1) Describe the abortion care workforce, (2) Evaluate the reported clinical abortion practice compared to current clinical practice guidelines, and (3) Assess stigma and harassment experienced by providers. Study Design: Cross-sectional, self-administered, anonymized survey available in French and English. Setting: National survey of abortion providers in Canada. Population studied: Physicians and NPs providing abortion care in 2019 were contacted through national professional health care organizations. Outcome measures: Respondent demographics, characteristics of first and second trimester surgical and first, second and third trimester medical abortion (STTMA) practices, and stigma and resilience experienced by providers. Results: Between July and December 2020, 435 physicians and 30 NPs were recruited, representing every province and territory in Canada. The highest proportions were from the most populated provinces: Ontario (31.8%) and Quebec (23.6%). Most physicians were family physicians (n=246) or obstetrician-gynaecologists (n=185). Among 358 FTMA respondents, 61.3% reported having less than five years experience and 99.4 % used a mifepristone misoprostol regimen. Of 115 STTMA respondents, 58.5% used an off-label but guideline supported mifepristone misoprostol regimen. Respondents included 222 first and second trimester surgical abortion providers. Only 4.6% of 109 second trimester surgical abortion provider respondents used mifepristone for preoperative cervical ripening. Twelve percent of respondents experienced harassment or violence in 2019, most commonly as picketing or confrontations at their workplace. Conclusion: Introduction of mifepristone and changes in abortion guidelines, regulations and licensing changed the abortion workforce and care in Canada. Respondents reported overall provision of FTMA in line with current guideline. Guideline supported second trimester use of mifepristone has not been fully adopted yet. The results of this study will inform knowledge translation activities directed at health system, policy, and service leaders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".