MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4226146833 · doi:10.1101/2022.04.05.22273469

Human Papillomavirus Infection Rate by Genotype and Vaccination Rates in Canada: Canadian Health Measures Survey 2009 to 2013

2022· preprint· en· W4226146833 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yi‐Sheng Chao

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenital wartsVaccinationMedicineGenotypeDemographyHPV infectionHuman papillomavirusHPV vaccinesCervical cancerInternal medicineBiologyCancerVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background An infection with certain HPV genotypes can lead to cancer or genital warts. HPV can be detected with PCR-based tests, and some genotypes can be prevented by vaccines. However, since the infection rates of various HPV genotypes have not been well reported, the present study aims to provide this information. Methods The Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS) is an ongoing biannual national survey. Between 2009 and 2011, it sampled a nationally representative sample of females aged 14 to 59 years to determine the infection rates of 46 HPV genotypes. Females aged 9 to 29 years and 9 to 59 years were asked whether they received HPV vaccines between 2009 to 2011 (cycle 2) and 2012 to 2013 (cycle 3), respectively. The reported infection rates and vaccination proportions were weighted and adjusted for the survey design. Results Among the estimated 10,592,968 females aged 14 to 59 years at cycle 2, the HPV genotypes with the highest infection rates were 16, 62, 74, and 54, and the rates were 3.42% (95% CI = 1.67% to 5.17%), 2.14% (95% CI = 0.68% to 3.59%), 2.1% (95% CI = 0.51% to 3.69%), and 2.04% (95% CI = 0.38% to 3.7%), respectively. There were an estimated 6,569,100 and 11,603,752 females aged 9 to 29 and 9 to 59 years at cycles 2 and 3, respectively. The proportions receiving a HPV vaccine were 13.55% (11.18% to 15.92%) and 12.3% (9.8% to 14.79%), respectively. The estimated numbers of females that received HPV vaccines were 890,197 and 1,427,000, respectively. Conclusion Canada is one of the few countries that conduct national surveys to determine HPV infection rates by genotype, which are not limited to the surveillance of carcinogenic genotypes. Our study found discrepancies between the HPV genotypes whose infections were the most common, that could be detected by PCR tests, that were carcinogenic, and that could be prevented by vaccines. For example, 5 of the 7 genotypes (42, 54, 62, 66, and 74) with infection rates of more than 1% cannot be detected by PCR tests and are not targeted by vaccines. HPV 51 is carcinogenic, associated with genital warts, and can be detected by PCR tests, but it is not targeted by vaccines. We recommend a better alignment of the genotypes targeted by HPV tests and vaccines with those genotypes with the highest infection rates in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.304

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicCervical Cancer and HPV Research→French-language works237,207→