Study the Effect of Wavelengths and Energies of Laser on Zinc Telluride Thin Films Formed with Laser Technique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, a pulsed laser deposition technique was used which is one of the modern methods of preparing thin films where zinc telluride was deposited on slices of glass using different Nd: YAG laser wavelengths (0.532 m and 1.064 m) .Two different laser energies (600 mJ and 900 mJ) were used to study its effects on the properties of Zinc Telluride films at room temperature. Measurement of X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) was used to demonstrate the structural and morphological properties of the prepared Zinc Telluride thin films which shows that the films consists of multiple crystals and its structural design is a cubic with a small crystallites size and dissimilar shapes . The optical properties in the range of (400-1000) nm using UV-VIS spectrophotometer were studied by transmission and reflection spectra where found that for Zinc Telluride films have more transmission in the range of visible spectrum which can be reach to greater than 90 % with wide band gap of 2.2 eV is a promising material to be used in photovoltaic devices as solar cells and detectors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".