MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226163103 · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac6dcb

The Lingering Death of Periodic Near-Sun Comet 323P/SOHO

2022· article· en· W4226163103 on OpenAlexaff
Man-To Hui, D. J. Tholen, R. Kracht, Chan-Kao Chang, Paul Wiegert, Quanzhi Ye, Max Mutchler

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsCometAstrophysicsGeometric albedoRADIUSAlbedo (alchemy)AstronomyEjectaRotation periodSolar SystemRotation (mathematics)Photometry (optics)StarsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We observed near-Sun comet 323P/SOHO for the first time using ground and space telescopes. In late 2020 December, the object was recovered at Subaru showing no cometary features on its way to perihelion. However, in our postperihelion observations, it developed a long narrow tail mimicking a disintegrated comet. The ejecta, composed of at least millimeter-sized dust with power-law size distribution index 3.2 ± 0.2, was impulsively produced shortly after the perihelion passage, during which ≳0.1%–10% of the nucleus mass was shed due to excessive thermal stress and rotational disruption. Two fragments of ∼20 m in radius (assuming a geometric albedo of 0.15) were seen in Hubble Space Telescope observations from early 2021 March. The nucleus, with an effective radius of 86 ± 3 m (the same albedo assumed) and an aspect ratio of ∼0.7, has a rotation period of 0.522 hr, which is the shortest for known comets in the solar system and implies cohesive strength ≳10–100 Pa in the interior. The color of the object was freakish and changed temporally in a never-before-seen manner. Using our astrometry, we found a strong nongravitational effect following a heliocentric dependency of r H − 8.5 in the transverse motion of the object. Our N-body integration reveals that 323P has a likelihood of 99.7% to collide with the Sun in the next two millennia driven by the ν 6 secular resonance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207