Report of the 1st and 2nd Mystery of Reactive Oxygen Species Conferences_suppl
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
sient ROS play an important role in the defense mechanism of immune cells and redox signaling, whereas prolonged ROS elevation is involved in disease development and progression.With global progress in the AOP development field, multiple, slightly nuanced KEs related to ROS have been created in the AOP-Wiki 2 .Many of these KEs are highly similar and largely redundant, which has catalyzed a need to create harmonized consensus KEs on ROS that can be shared in a modular fashion between closely related pathways and networks.To address this need, a consortium of ROS and AOP experts has been formed to discuss the "Mystery of ROS" and develop consensus KEs for this field.This meeting report summarizes initial efforts of the "Mystery of ROS" consortium to harmonize the ROS-related KEs currently available in the AOP-Wiki.The two new modular KEs reflect discussion from the group relating to the effects of ROS presenting a "double-edged sword" by describing the concepts of "up-regulation of ROS" and "diminished protective response." Summary of the discussions in the consortiumThe international online conferences on the Mystery of ROS took place on May 31, 2021 and October 8, 2021.At the first conference on Mystery of ROS (I), a brief introduction of the ROS collaboration was followed by eight presentations, which are listed in Table 1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it