MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226178423 · doi:10.1016/j.gexplo.2022.106995

Geochemical characterization of the Central Mineral Belt U ± Cu ± Mo ± V mineralization, Labrador, Canada: Application of unsupervised machine-learning for evaluation of IOCG and affiliated mineral potential

2022· article· en· W4226178423 on OpenAlex
P Acosta-Góngora, E G Potter, C J M Lawley, Louise Corriveau, G. W. Sparkes

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geochemical Exploration · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsGovernment of Newfoundland and LabradorNatural Resources CanadaGeological Survey of Canada
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsIron oxide copper gold ore depositsMetasomatismGeochemistryGeologyMineralization (soil science)MaficFelsicSkarnProterozoicArcheanIgneous rockZirconHydrothermal circulationMantle (geology)PaleontologyFluid inclusionsTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Central Mineral Belt (CMB) in Labrador, Canada, hosts multiple U (±base ± precious metal) showings, prospects and deposits in metamorphosed and variably hydrothermally altered Neoarchean to Mesoproterozoic, igneous and sedimentary rocks. Previous work has recognized U mineralization locally associated with Fe-Ca and alkali metasomatism typical of metasomatic iron oxide and alkali-calcic alteration systems (IOAA) that host iron oxide-copper-gold (IOCG) and affiliated critical metal deposits. However, the type, extent and temporal or genetic relationships between the diverse Fe, Ca and alkali metasomatism and the regionally distributed U mineralization remains poorly understood. Combined unsupervised machine-learning and classification of alteration from a large geochemical dataset distinguish the main alteration phases in the CMB, identify compositional changes related to U mineralization, and infer lithological/mineralogical information from samples with censored (i.e., missing), limited and/or inaccurate metadata. Weak to intense Na and Na + Ca-Fe (Mg) metasomatism in the southwest (Two-Time and Moran Lake areas) and eastern (Michelin area) portions of the CMB pre-dates U mineralization and Fe-oxide breccia development, similar to albitite-hosted U and IOCG deposits globally. Rare earth elements and spider diagrams highlight both preservation and disruption of normally immobile elements. Principal component and cluster analysis indicate significant variations in Fe-Mg ± Na contents in the rocks from combinations of Na, Ca, Fe, and Mg-rich alteration, while protolith REE signatures can be locally preserved even after pervasive albitization-hematization. Cluster analysis identifies mineralized felsic and mafic rocks in the Michelin deposit and Moran Lake area, facilitating inference of relevant lithological/mineralogical information from samples lacking or with limited meta-data. The methods outlined provide rapid and relatively inexpensive means to optimize identification of mineral systems within large geochemical datasets, verify drill core or field observations, highlight potentially overlooked alteration, and refine economic mineral potential assessments. Based on our results and previous work, we suggest the mineral potential of the southwestern and eastern CMB needs to be re-assessed with modern exploration models for IOAA ore systems and their iron oxide-poor variants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.676
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it