Development of Regional Climate Model (RCM) for Cameron Highlands based on Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) 4.5 and 8.5
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Development of local climate is important for climate hazard assessment. Cameron Highlands was chosen as study area (longitude from 101°21’ to 101°30’ and latitude from 4°19’ to 4°37’) for climate downscaling. This paper presents the work of downscaling techniques and regional climate model (RCM) development. The second-generation Canadian Earth System Model (CanESM2) based on the representative concentration pathways (RCP) 4.5 and 8.5 was applied to develop the local climate model for the period 2020-2100. The climatic parameters chosen were temperature (maximum and minimum) and rainfall. The simulated RCMs are then analysed using statistical reliability including Pearson correlation coefficient, linear regression, root mean square error (RMSE) and probability density function (PDF). The result showed that the simulated maximum, minimum temperature, and rainfall are most likely to follow RCP 8.5 scenario. Precipitation threshold for occurrence of flood event was estimated using intensity duration frequency (IDF) relationship generated by maximum precipitation. Return period of two years and four hours rainfall duration is used for threshold estimation as the rainfall is convective. The daily rainfall threshold for flood occurrence is estimated to be 11.3 mm/hr.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".