Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents estimates of the social minimum for conditions in the third quarter of 2021. They take into account the extent and pattern of need satisfaction under typical conditions. Due to the lack of data on changes in household consumption in 2021, the unusual conditions of Covid-19 have not yet been taken into account. When they appear and if there is a need to change the model assumptions, the value of the social minimum for this period can be estimated again. External conditions for households in the period under review were reasonably favourable (falling unemployment rate to 5.6%, decreasing number of registered unemployed). The increase in consumer prices amounted to 1%. The value of the social minimum increased modestly: by 0.6% in households without children, by 0.8% among households of pensioners, by 1.1% in a family with an older child (from 13 to 15 years of age). This insignificant increase was due to the lower valuation of food (a decrease from 0.4% to 0.5% depending on the type of household). Expenditure on housing and energy – the second important category in the model – increased from 0.8% in one-person households to 1% in four- and five-person families
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".